In “DOJ Action Is A Cautionary Tale On Employer No-Poach Pacts,” Eric Walz and Adam Shafran provide their expert analysis and highlight a significant consequence of the DOJ’s recent indictment of a company for utilizing a no-poach agreement to restrict movement of top level employees (United States of America v. Surgical Care Affiliates, LLC and SCAI Holdings, LLC). When viewed alongside other recent legislative developments, such as the Criminal Antitrust Anti-Retaliation Act (CAARA), the indictment provides employers, franchises, and others with good reason to review their current employment practices, policies and procedures.
Selling a home—especially when preparing to move out of state—can be extremely stressful and requires…
A major Massachusetts business litigation case now before the appellate courts could reshape the boundaries…
Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly recently featured a Superior Court ruling in a wage and employment dispute…
A recent Superior Court case, 477 Harrison Ave, LLC v. Jace Boston, LLC et al…
It is often said that being a residential landlord in Massachusetts is difficult. There is…
George Barclay and Alvin Nathanson secured a significant appellate victory for a Rudolph Friedmann client…