In “DOJ Action Is A Cautionary Tale On Employer No-Poach Pacts,” Eric Walz and Adam Shafran provide their expert analysis and highlight a significant consequence of the DOJ’s recent indictment of a company for utilizing a no-poach agreement to restrict movement of top level employees (United States of America v. Surgical Care Affiliates, LLC and SCAI Holdings, LLC). When viewed alongside other recent legislative developments, such as the Criminal Antitrust Anti-Retaliation Act (CAARA), the indictment provides employers, franchises, and others with good reason to review their current employment practices, policies and procedures.
In the residential landlord-tenant context, many leases call upon the tenant to obtain insurance to…
A recent Massachusetts Superior Court decision offers important guidance for both employers and job applicants…
Robert Rudolph was recently quoted in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly for his analysis of a federal court decision…
Will Korman, a criminal defense attorney, appeared on Court TV on August 26 as a…
Selling a home—especially when preparing to move out of state—can be extremely stressful and requires…
A major Massachusetts business litigation case now before the appellate courts could reshape the boundaries…