In “DOJ Action Is A Cautionary Tale On Employer No-Poach Pacts,” Eric Walz and Adam Shafran provide their expert analysis and highlight a significant consequence of the DOJ’s recent indictment of a company for utilizing a no-poach agreement to restrict movement of top level employees (United States of America v. Surgical Care Affiliates, LLC and SCAI Holdings, LLC). When viewed alongside other recent legislative developments, such as the Criminal Antitrust Anti-Retaliation Act (CAARA), the indictment provides employers, franchises, and others with good reason to review their current employment practices, policies and procedures.
Many real estate purchase and sale agreements contain a specific deadline by which the parties…
To combat fraud by companies seeking to profit off government contracts and reimbursement programs, Congress…
On October 31, 2023, a federal civil jury found that the National Association of Realtors…
In Massachusetts, the Supplier Diversity Program is a state program that encourages state agencies to…
For nearly two decades, the First Circuit has recognized that there can typically be no…
Rudolph Friedmann attorneys Jonathon Friedmann and Eric Walz recently concluded a five-day jury waived trial…