Real Estate

No Commission Without Consideration: The Legal Pitfalls of Exclusivity Agreements in Property Sales

In the dynamic world of real estate transactions, exclusivity agreements play a pivotal role in securing deals and protecting the interests of brokers and their clients. These agreements, often entered into between a broker and a prospective buyer or seller, grant exclusive rights to the broker to represent the client in a specific transaction or within a defined timeframe. Exclusivity agreements establish a legal relationship between a broker and a client, granting the broker exclusive rights to represent the client in buying or selling real estate.

While exclusivity agreements offer significant benefits, they must be carefully crafted with proper consideration to withstand potential legal challenges. Consideration is a fundamental principle in contract law that refers to something of value exchanged between parties to a contract. In the context of exclusivity agreements in property sales, consideration is crucial as it ensures that the agreement is legally binding and enforceable. Without valid consideration, an exclusivity agreement may be deemed unenforceable in a court of law.

In a recent Massachusetts case, one broker learned this lesson the hard way. The court confirmed that brokers are generally entitled to commissions only if the broker is the predominating cause of the property sale. While Massachusetts courts recognize that a broker may be entitled to a commission under different circumstances, there must be consideration to uphold exclusivity agreements. This means that if a seller sells a property independent of the broker, and the language of the exclusivity agreement does not provide for a commission under other circumstances, the exclusivity agreement may be declared legally invalid. In those instances, the broker will not benefit from the exclusivity agreement at issue. Such was the case for this particular broker, who did not meaningfully participate in the sale of the property and was instead deemed a passive recipient of the potential benefits of the exclusivity agreement.

In the realm of real estate transactions, exclusivity agreements serve as valuable tools for brokers to secure business opportunities. However, those business opportunities could be lost without proper consideration to ensure the validity and enforceability of these agreements. By understanding the importance of consideration and crafting agreements that align with legal requirements and fair practices, brokers can navigate property sales transactions in a manner effective for all involved parties.

Published by
Casey Sack

Recent Posts

Jon Friedmann Named a Go To Commercial/Consumer Lawyer by Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

Jon Friedmann, founding partner of Rudolph Friedmann and chair of the firm’s litigation practice, has…

6 days ago

Is it a Bird? Is it a Plane? No, it’s a Drone That Must Be Registered with the FAA

As drones become more common for recreation, photography, and business, many people don’t realize they’re…

6 days ago

Casey Sack Selected as Fellow in the 2025-26 Class of the Massachusetts Bar Association Leadership Academy

Casey Sack has been selected as a fellow of the 2025–26 class of the Massachusetts…

2 weeks ago

Eight Rudolph Friedmann Attorneys Recognized on 2025 Massachusetts Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Lists

Rudolph Friedmann is pleased to announce that eight of the firm’s attorneys have been selected…

3 weeks ago

Failure of Prompt and Fair Settlement of Insurance Claims Can Result in Double or Treble Damages

Under Massachusetts law, Chapter 93A and Chapter 176D encourage the settlement of insurance claims and…

3 weeks ago

Should My Real Estate Be in a Trust?

Clients often ask if they should put their real property into a trust. The answer…

4 weeks ago