In “DOJ Action Is A Cautionary Tale On Employer No-Poach Pacts,” Eric Walz and Adam Shafran provide their expert analysis and highlight a significant consequence of the DOJ’s recent indictment of a company for utilizing a no-poach agreement to restrict movement of top level employees (United States of America v. Surgical Care Affiliates, LLC and SCAI Holdings, LLC). When viewed alongside other recent legislative developments, such as the Criminal Antitrust Anti-Retaliation Act (CAARA), the indictment provides employers, franchises, and others with good reason to review their current employment practices, policies and procedures.
Clients often ask if they should put their real property into a trust. The answer…
Jonathon Friedmann and Casey Sack were featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly on September 22, 2025,…
The employment relationship in Massachusetts is governed by various state and federal laws that dictate…
Rudolph Friedmann LLP is pleased to announce that three of its lawyers have received recognition…
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court recently clarified that the Massachusetts Noncompetition Agreement Act (“Act”) does…
Getting pulled over by the police can be a stressful experience. In Massachusetts, understanding your…