In “DOJ Action Is A Cautionary Tale On Employer No-Poach Pacts,” Eric Walz and Adam Shafran provide their expert analysis and highlight a significant consequence of the DOJ’s recent indictment of a company for utilizing a no-poach agreement to restrict movement of top level employees (United States of America v. Surgical Care Affiliates, LLC and SCAI Holdings, LLC). When viewed alongside other recent legislative developments, such as the Criminal Antitrust Anti-Retaliation Act (CAARA), the indictment provides employers, franchises, and others with good reason to review their current employment practices, policies and procedures.
Jon Friedmann, founding partner of Rudolph Friedmann and chair of the firm’s litigation practice, has…
As drones become more common for recreation, photography, and business, many people don’t realize they’re…
Casey Sack has been selected as a fellow of the 2025–26 class of the Massachusetts…
Rudolph Friedmann is pleased to announce that eight of the firm’s attorneys have been selected…
Under Massachusetts law, Chapter 93A and Chapter 176D encourage the settlement of insurance claims and…
Clients often ask if they should put their real property into a trust. The answer…