In “DOJ Action Is A Cautionary Tale On Employer No-Poach Pacts,” Eric Walz and Adam Shafran provide their expert analysis and highlight a significant consequence of the DOJ’s recent indictment of a company for utilizing a no-poach agreement to restrict movement of top level employees (United States of America v. Surgical Care Affiliates, LLC and SCAI Holdings, LLC). When viewed alongside other recent legislative developments, such as the Criminal Antitrust Anti-Retaliation Act (CAARA), the indictment provides employers, franchises, and others with good reason to review their current employment practices, policies and procedures.
In Parexel Int'l LLC v. PrisymID Ltd., the United States District Court of Massachusetts allowed…
Casey Sack presented at the Massachusetts Bar Association’s CLE program, “Expert Witnesses in Construction Disputes:…
Jim Rudolph has been named a Go To Construction Lawyer by Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly. The…
Construction projects often involve work performed by subcontractors. While this makes sense given the varying…
Firm’s client accused of breach of fiduciary duty, conversion and breach of contract; lawsuit requested…
Because of a loophole in the Massachusetts Wiretap Statute, also known as G.L. c. 272,…