In “DOJ Action Is A Cautionary Tale On Employer No-Poach Pacts,” Eric Walz and Adam Shafran provide their expert analysis and highlight a significant consequence of the DOJ’s recent indictment of a company for utilizing a no-poach agreement to restrict movement of top level employees (United States of America v. Surgical Care Affiliates, LLC and SCAI Holdings, LLC). When viewed alongside other recent legislative developments, such as the Criminal Antitrust Anti-Retaliation Act (CAARA), the indictment provides employers, franchises, and others with good reason to review their current employment practices, policies and procedures.
Alexander Tsianatelis will serve as a panelist at the Boston Bar Association program, “Decoding the…
The distinctions between a statute of limitation and a statute of repose are both technical…
Jon Friedmann and Casey Sack have been recognized by Boston magazine as two of the…
There is a concept in the law known as waiver, which means that failing to…
Jon Friedmann, founding partner of Rudolph Friedmann and chair of the firm’s litigation practice, has…
As drones become more common for recreation, photography, and business, many people don’t realize they’re…