Categories: Employment

Let Them Eat Lunch – Massachusetts Meal Break Law

By Adam J. Shafran, Esq.

Under Massachusetts law, employees who work more than six hours a day must be allowed at least thirty minutes unpaid time for a meal break. A violation of the meal time provision is subject to fines between $300 and $600.

Employees are entitled to meal time compensation if their movement is restricted during the break or if the employee is required to perform a job function during the break. The decision to waive a meal break must be voluntary and only the employee has the power to waive a meal period.

Under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, if an employer provides a lunch break, and the employee eats during the break, the employer still may have to pay for the entire lunch period, depending on what else the employee does during that time. The test for when a meal period may be unpaid is as follows: “As long as the employee can pursue his or her mealtime adequately and comfortably, is not engaged in the performance of any substantial duties, and does not spend time predominantly for the employer’s benefit the time is not compensable.”

Employer’s meal break policies may create an environment where their employees perform off-the-clock work without compensation in violation of the FLSA. Employers are responsible for ensuring their employees are not working through unpaid meal periods, and employees should not work without compensation during their meal periods.

The consequences for having an uncompensated employee who works through their meal break time can be substantial. Frequently, employers instruct their payroll companies to automatically deduct 30 minutes of pay from their employees’ wages without ensuring the employees did not actually work during this time. If this practice goes on for a substantial period of time, an employer can be liable to each employees who worked through their break at three times the employee’s hourly wage rate for every 30 minute break worked through.

Published by
Adam Shafran

Recent Posts

Jon Friedmann Named a Go To Commercial/Consumer Lawyer by Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

Jon Friedmann, founding partner of Rudolph Friedmann and chair of the firm’s litigation practice, has…

2 days ago

Is it a Bird? Is it a Plane? No, it’s a Drone That Must Be Registered with the FAA

As drones become more common for recreation, photography, and business, many people don’t realize they’re…

2 days ago

Casey Sack Selected as Fellow in the 2025-26 Class of the Massachusetts Bar Association Leadership Academy

Casey Sack has been selected as a fellow of the 2025–26 class of the Massachusetts…

2 weeks ago

Eight Rudolph Friedmann Attorneys Recognized on 2025 Massachusetts Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Lists

Rudolph Friedmann is pleased to announce that eight of the firm’s attorneys have been selected…

2 weeks ago

Failure of Prompt and Fair Settlement of Insurance Claims Can Result in Double or Treble Damages

Under Massachusetts law, Chapter 93A and Chapter 176D encourage the settlement of insurance claims and…

2 weeks ago

Should My Real Estate Be in a Trust?

Clients often ask if they should put their real property into a trust. The answer…

3 weeks ago