Separate Companies May Constitute a Single Employer for Liability Purposes

Is your company a single employer?

Earlier this year, a Massachusetts Superior Court for the first time applied the “single integrated employer” theory of liability to a case involving a restaurant chain, ruling that employees from separately incorporated but related entities could bring a class action against each of the entities under the state Wage Act. (See our March blog post “New Case Establishes Liability for Boston Restaurant Owners with Multiple Locations.”) This decision made it more economically viable for employees to collectively assert Wage Act claims for violations of their rights, exposing the assets of all entities.

Rudolph Friedmann attorneys Jon Friedmann and Adam Shafran are involved in a matter with facts similar to Fitzgerald, et. al. v. The Chateau Restaurant Corporation, et. al. referenced in our March blog post. They highlight critical steps corporations can take to limit liability under the “single integrated employer” theory – a status that is determined by examining four factors:

  • Interrelation of operations
  • Common management
  • Centralized control of labor relations
  • Common ownership

Each element of the test is fact intensive and no one factor determines the level of interconnectedness amongst related businesses.

Organizations can reduce their risk and limit liability with proper planning and implementation. Some of the steps that can be taken include:

  • Limiting the commonality of officers, directors and owners
  • Confining the parent corporation’s role to broad issues and avoiding day-to-day review or control of the individual entities
  • Limiting the movement of employees among the various entities and identifying actions as “terminations” and “hires” not “transfers”
  • Setting up separate payroll accounts for each business and having each company pay its own bills
  • Creating HR materials, such as employee handbooks, applications and policies, for each entity and avoiding the use of common materials
  • Identifying the entities as separate companies on web sites and other marketing collateral and using distinct letterhead and business cards for each company

There are numerous additional actions companies can take to separate their operations. If you own multiple related businesses, contact Jon Friedmann or Adam Shafran to discuss the details of your operating structure and ensure that you have taken the necessary steps to limit the liability of your organization.

Published by
RF Lawyers

Recent Posts

The Distinctions Between a Statute of Limitations and a Statute of Repose

The distinctions between a statute of limitation and a statute of repose are both technical…

2 months ago

Jon Friedmann and Casey Sack Selected for Boston Magazine’s 2025 Top Lawyers List

Jon Friedmann and Casey Sack have been recognized by Boston magazine as two of the…

2 months ago

Absentee Owners Beware: Your Co-Owner Can Kick You to the Curb

There is a concept in the law known as waiver, which means that failing to…

2 months ago

Jon Friedmann Named a Go To Commercial/Consumer Lawyer by Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

Jon Friedmann, founding partner of Rudolph Friedmann and chair of the firm’s litigation practice, has…

3 months ago

Is it a Bird? Is it a Plane? No, it’s a Drone That Must Be Registered with the FAA

As drones become more common for recreation, photography, and business, many people don’t realize they’re…

3 months ago

Casey Sack Selected as Fellow in the 2025-26 Class of the Massachusetts Bar Association Leadership Academy

Casey Sack has been selected as a fellow of the 2025–26 class of the Massachusetts…

3 months ago